People fighting for truth in the battle with lazy policing and that believe in the rights of innocent and peaceful cannabis consumers believe in the quality Kush friendly clothing offers. You know that arresting, verbalizing, put in custody, trying, releasing and the fines imposed on more than thirty thousand cannabis users annually involves a substantial number of police work. You know that this is effort that can easily be used in other places as they are needed elsewhere.
It will not take a lot to convince you that the only thing relevant to cannabis prohibition, is the prohibition itself and its survival, rather than the stories that are told about cannabis and its dangers. During a certain time, why the ban originated, and which authorities stood to benefit from it in any way, is of course important, and also nice to give you some background on the issue. You can instantly realize that the New York Police Department benefits from it, for example.
The core of the argument is that cannabis prohibition has a status that is free from rational and functional assessments. Cannabis prohibition is the reason for its own existence, and fulfills spiritual needs of a different nature than that for which it was founded. It is important to keep scientific facts in mind when discussing the issue.
You can ask European researchers across the pond to answer why cannabis is prohibited in their countries by the main bodies of their national enforcement systems. They will all reply, in very interesting ways, try it for yourself. The Swedish do it because cannabis is seen there as a stepping stone to other drugs, because it fosters apathy, and they have even accused the plant of causing schizophrenia. They believe that it can cause dependence, and various levels of psychosis.
The English tend to be was much shorter in their answer to being asked why prohibition continues with them, simply not wishing to get into details. None of them, not even the smartest can claim that their statements are scientifically tenable. They just simply say that cannabis is 'just bad' for people, in all sorts of ways, and also widely seen as a step towards the use of other drugs.
There are similarities and differences between the responses various authorities will give you. The story about cannabis as a source of violence is only to be found in England and the USA. Of all the stories provided by the authorities, scientifically speaking, every one is either incorrect or highly questionable.
Cannabis as a stepping stone to other drugs, is the story you find everywhere, but it is really no longer even able to hold up to scrutiny, either. In one of the most elaborate calculations ever to be devoted, using two large random samples of the population of Amsterdam, scientists confirmed that drug use begins with tobacco, followed by alcohol.
Levine concludes from numerous interviews that there are a number of benefits to the NYC cannabis arrests. It delivers very high production figures. The police needed a style of management, for which statistics of 'production' are required. It also provides police officers with a much-needed overtime, through relatively easy and risk-free work. Stand up for what you know to be true and wear quality garments, showing your support for truth.
It will not take a lot to convince you that the only thing relevant to cannabis prohibition, is the prohibition itself and its survival, rather than the stories that are told about cannabis and its dangers. During a certain time, why the ban originated, and which authorities stood to benefit from it in any way, is of course important, and also nice to give you some background on the issue. You can instantly realize that the New York Police Department benefits from it, for example.
The core of the argument is that cannabis prohibition has a status that is free from rational and functional assessments. Cannabis prohibition is the reason for its own existence, and fulfills spiritual needs of a different nature than that for which it was founded. It is important to keep scientific facts in mind when discussing the issue.
You can ask European researchers across the pond to answer why cannabis is prohibited in their countries by the main bodies of their national enforcement systems. They will all reply, in very interesting ways, try it for yourself. The Swedish do it because cannabis is seen there as a stepping stone to other drugs, because it fosters apathy, and they have even accused the plant of causing schizophrenia. They believe that it can cause dependence, and various levels of psychosis.
The English tend to be was much shorter in their answer to being asked why prohibition continues with them, simply not wishing to get into details. None of them, not even the smartest can claim that their statements are scientifically tenable. They just simply say that cannabis is 'just bad' for people, in all sorts of ways, and also widely seen as a step towards the use of other drugs.
There are similarities and differences between the responses various authorities will give you. The story about cannabis as a source of violence is only to be found in England and the USA. Of all the stories provided by the authorities, scientifically speaking, every one is either incorrect or highly questionable.
Cannabis as a stepping stone to other drugs, is the story you find everywhere, but it is really no longer even able to hold up to scrutiny, either. In one of the most elaborate calculations ever to be devoted, using two large random samples of the population of Amsterdam, scientists confirmed that drug use begins with tobacco, followed by alcohol.
Levine concludes from numerous interviews that there are a number of benefits to the NYC cannabis arrests. It delivers very high production figures. The police needed a style of management, for which statistics of 'production' are required. It also provides police officers with a much-needed overtime, through relatively easy and risk-free work. Stand up for what you know to be true and wear quality garments, showing your support for truth.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét